In its leader about the demonstration in London the Independent says (my emphasis):
Pictures of injured police and masked youths smashing windows and cash-points … could not but taint the day of protest as a whole. It is no wonder that trade-union leaders moved quickly yesterday to insist that the actions of a few hundred people should not be allowed to detract from the main message of the official protest. But this is, to an extent, what happened; the force of the pictures made that inevitable.
That may very well be true but it leaves a big question mark hanging in the air: Where did such forceful pictures come from and how did people come to see them? The answer of course is that they were published in the media. So the Independent is clearly admitting that people inevitably have an inaccurate, distorted impression of what happened on Saturday because they believed what they saw in the media. These pictures for example are from the Independent itself:
What is really saddening, but not at all surprising, is that the Independent seems utterly unaware of the irony of what it is saying.
Recent Comments